tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1846340485746544317.post6045412114913404227..comments2023-12-24T07:09:28.531-05:00Comments on NoExcuses: Transplanting Two Lungs Is Better than Just OneUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1846340485746544317.post-36060316367201764702009-04-23T13:03:00.000-04:002009-04-23T13:03:00.000-04:00Of course 2 lungs is better than one. But I know a...Of course 2 lungs is better than one. But I know a number of people who have had a single lung tx and have done very well. 4 Cfers and 2 NonCfers. all doing well.<br /><br /> But 2 new lungs is always better than one.But you take what you can get. The full panel ( heart and 2 lungs is best IMO.<br /><br /> One is better than None !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1846340485746544317.post-7846578482992767812009-04-23T11:47:00.000-04:002009-04-23T11:47:00.000-04:00This is along the same lines as the girl who had 4...This is along the same lines as the girl who had 4 transplants AND gave her heart for someone else...<br /><br />her lungs and new heart were done even tho her original heart was fine because statistically they found a better survival/recovery rate not having to reconnect the lungs to the heart...<br /><br />makes sense<br /><br />MelAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com